2.For many designers, Photoshop is the only graphics program that will ever cut it. Hopefully, our selection of the best free programs for photo editing on Mac will help you choose the right app to suit all your creative needs. It does a good job at organizing your photos, but its collection of photo enhancement tools leaves much to be desired. Apple’s Photos app is included for free on all recently released Macs.
Programs Like Photoshop Professional FREE AndKrita is a professional FREE and open source painting program.While Adobe charges a fee to use its main Photoshop software, the company does offer free image editing tools in the form of the Photoshop Express application. Texture and matte painters. It is made by artists that want to see affordable art tools for everyone.I do need to state that these programs are not complete replacements for all Photoshop functionality.So, if they aren’t a complete replacement, why bother?Firstly, if you examine your workflows, you’ll likely find that you use the same 5% of functions 95% of the time.Cut, paste, crop, layers, text tool, opacity, color adjustments, masks and lasso selections probably covers off a large percentage of what you do.Secondly, if you’re like many of us, you probably operate two, three or even possibly more computers, both at home and at work. There are at least a dozen more desktop alternatives for Windows, Mac, or Linux.But today, I want to talk about growing band of increasingly impressive web-based, OS-independent Photoshop alternatives. Most of you have heard about GIMP (or maybe even use it) as a Photoshop alternative. That's why I recomlnended obtaining a program like Audacity, a free.![]() ![]() Edit contains options such as Crop, Resize, Red-Eye, Touchup, basic adjustments, such as White Balance, Sharpen, etc., and effects such as Crystalize, Pixelate, etc.The Decorate tab contains options for Text, Bubbles, Frames, etc.This is all you get from Photoshop Express, and it seems to be pitched more firmly at home and small office photo-retouchers, than anyone manipulating imagery for a living.Certainly not a comprehensive Photoshop or GIMP stand-in, but still useful for basic tasks, if you are comfortable with a JPEG only output. Here you have two tabs – Edit and Decorate. Secondly, you can’t create a photo from scratch – unless you don’t upload an empty one.Thirdly, it has a fraction of the functionality.Ironically, the interface of Pixlr and especially Sumopaint is more similar to Photoshop than the interface of Photoshop Express, so if you are used to the Photoshop interface, you might find yourself searching for basic stuff.On the other hand, Photoshop Express is so feature-limited, that it can’t take long to search and understand the entire application.Most of the functionality is concentrated in the left frame (where usually the Toolbox is). Firstly, you can work with JPEG only. They promote themselves as the world’s most advanced online image editor, though I wouldn’t say this — especially when I compare it to the other editors on the list.For me personally FotoFlexer is not a true contender for GIMP/Photoshop replacement and this is not just because it has the interface of a Web application, rather than a desktop graphics program.For a designer, who is used to the interface of GIMP/Photoshop, this Web-app interface is confusing. FotoFlexerFotoFlexer is a free program with plenty of options. All in all, Lunapic is a fascinating editor, and I dare say in some aspects it’s even better than GIMP/Photoshop. While most other graphic editors don’t tend to treat these options as ‘tools in a toolbox’, I must admit it’s convenient to have them there.You have the same commands you know from GIMP/Photoshop, but they live in strange places, like Crop, Resize, or Scale in the Edit menu.Of course, this isn’t the end of the world, but if you are used to the way menu items are arranged in GIMP/Photoshop, this will be a little confusing at first.One more difference between the menus of Lunapic and the menus in GIMP/Photoshop is that Lunapic offers (probably) more functionality than the base versions of GIMP and Photoshop.Of course, you might never need these functionality, but it’s nice to know they are there.Just have a look at just some of the options you have available!To be honest, I couldn’t sample all the options in the menus – this will require a day or two – but from my testing, it was all very impressive.You can even edit videos with Lunapic, not to mention the numerous animation options. These are handy for Web graphics and are nice to have even though you might not use them very often.The Lunapic toolbox is a little… peculiar, containing options such as Cut, Copy, Paste, or Print. Its interface is a blend of web app and GIMP/Photoshop, but this isn’t very confusing.In terms of features, it has plenty of them – both features that are standard for a desktop graphics program, and features many other, if any, editors have.For instance, with Lunapic you can encrypt/decrypt images or save them to your computer, Imgur, email, Tumblr, Picasa, Facebook, Web, etc. Free imedia converter for macSure, they don’t replicate every features of Photoshop and GIMP, but they offer more than enough for advanced design tasks.They are viable alternatives and depending on what your design tasks are, could well be a replacement of the basic versions of GIMP and Photoshop.One aspect that I personally can’t go without is the GIMP/Photoshop plugin infrastructure, but if basic functionalities are to be compared, for web graphics, Pixlr, Sumopaint, and Lunapic could all make me ditch my dependency on the desktop.Photoshop Express and FotoFlexer certainly have fewer features and more limitations, but can perform a range of relatively complex graphics tasks.However, their limited functionality would rule them out of anything beyond the most basic design tasks.I’ve been amazed at what can be accomplished in a modern browser today.Even if it’s just when you visit your parents or friends, give these apps a test drive. ConclusionPixlr, Sumopaint, and Lunapic are all unusually rich in features and can comfortably compete with Photoshop and GIMP for many day-to-day graphics projects. However, FotoFlexer has ads and is also a little slow.Of course, these don’t have to be deal-breakers, and since it does have good options for basic image editing and beyond, for many design tasks, it’s a choice.Here are the FotoFlexer menus to get an idea of what it can do.There are some good options and you can do really a lot with FotoFlexer, but I couldn’t pitch it as a genuine Photoshop/GIMP replacement. Smooth and Sharpen are under Beautify.Of course, if everything else works OK, then the interface issue just becomes a minor glitch in the beginning.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorMeech ArchivesCategories |